| Head Injury |
Supratentorial Tumors |
Posterior Fossa Surgery|
Intracranial Aneurysms
|Ischemic Cerebrovascular Diseases
|Neuroendocrine Tumors
|Epilepsy-Awake
Craniotomy-Intraoperative MRI
|Spinal Cord Injury and Procedures
|Pediatric Neuroanesthesia
|Neurosurgery in the Pregnant
Patient
|Management of Therapeutic
Interventional Neuroradiology
|Management in Diagnostic
Neuroradiology
|
Anesthesia for
Posterior Fossa Surgery
Operations in the posterior fossa are often
demanding, delicate, and long. Anesthesia for these
cases can also be challenging. In addition to the
anesthetic management issues that apply to
supratentorial surgery, posterior fossa surgery
presents special problems related to positioning,
cranial nerve dysfunction, and prevention of and
monitoring for (VAE).
I. Preoperative considerations
The reticular activating system, cranial nerves, and
structures vital for control of the airway and
cardiovascular and respiratory systems are contained
within a very small space in the posterior fossa.
Accordingly, patients may present with dysphagia,
laryngeal dysfunction, respiratory irregularities,
or altered states of consciousness. In some cases,
chronic aspiration owing to loss of airway reflexes
can further compromise respiratory function.
Hydrocephalus caused by obstruction of ventricular
outflow is a common cause of increased intracranial
pressure (ICP) with posterior fossa lesions. This is
evident on the preoperative computed tomographic
scan or magnetic resonance imaging scan and can be
treated by ventricular drainage, endoscopic third
ventriculostomy, or hypertonic osmotherapy with
mannitol and furosemide administered either pre- or
intraoperatively.
II. Positioning
General issues
Posterior fossa surgery often requires unusual
patient positioning. The prone, lateral, park bench,
and sitting positions are commonly used. Regardless
of the position chosen, care in positioning is of
utmost importance because most problems are
presumably avoidable with careful positioning and
padding of vulnerable areas.
In the prone position, facial skin ulcerations can
occur from uneven pressure distribution when the
horseshoe headrest is used, and blindness can result
from pressure on the globe of the eye.
In the lateral and park bench positions, there is a
risk of brachial plexus injury if the up arm is
pulled caudally to gain access to the retromastoid
area.
Excessive neck rotation can also stretch and damage
the brachial plexus, and extreme neck flexion is
associated with the risk of quadriplegia.
Injury to the ulnar nerve at the elbow and peroneal
nerve at the knee is also possible.
The sitting position
Advantages of the sitting position include good
surgical exposure, improved ventilation, better
access to the airway, greater comfort for the
surgeon, and possibly reduced blood loss.
Disadvantages include the risk of VAE and
pneumocephalus and the potential for hemodynamic
instability. Additional complications include
sciatic nerve injury from extreme flexion of the
hip, massive swelling of the face and tongue from
extreme neck flexion and/or rotation, and
midcervical quadriplegia (ostensibly caused by a
combination of stretch or compression of the cord by
extreme neck flexion and hypotension).
The main contraindication to the use of the sitting
position, however, is the presence of a documented
right-to-left intracardiac or pulmonary shunt, which
would facilitate systemic embolization of air.
VAE
VAE can occur whenever pressure within an open
vessel is subatmospheric. Clinically significant VAE
is unusual unless the surgical site is >20 cm above
the level of the heart. Hence, VAE is a particular
problem during surgery in the seated position, but
it also occurs, albeit less frequently, in patients
operated on in the lateral or prone position.
When open vessels cannot collapse, which is the case
with major venous sinuses as well as bridging and
epidural veins, the risk of VAE increases
substantially. Most studies indicate that the
incidence of VAE during posterior fossa procedures
in the sitting position is 40% to 45%. For seated
cervical laminectomy or surgery in the prone or
lateral positions, VAE occurs in approximately 10%
to 15% of cases.
Massive air embolism produces abrupt and
catastrophic hemodynamic changes. Fortunately, this
type of VAE is rare.
More commonly, air entrainment occurs slowly over a
longer period of time and may produce little or no
respiratory or hemodynamic compromise.
a.
As air is cleared to the pulmonary circulation,
pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary artery
(PA) and right atrial pressures increase.
b.
This vascular obstruction increases dead-space
ventilation, resulting in the decrease in end-tidal
carbon dioxide (ETco2) and increase in partial
pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (Paco2) that are
characteristic of VAE. In addition, nitrogen appears
in the exhaled gas.
c.
Hypoxemia develops owing to the partially occluded
pulmonary vasculature and the local release of
vasoactive substances.
d.
If unchecked, cardiac output decreases as a result
of right heart failure and/or reduced left
ventricular filling.
Despite firmly held opinions and anecdotes, there is
little evidence that the sitting position at
least when used in large centers doing large numbers
of sitting cases is less safe than alternative
surgical positions. It is therefore difficult to
argue that the sitting position should be abandoned
purely because of the risk of VAE.
Paradoxic air embolism (PAE)
When air enters the venous circulation, there is a
risk that the air could pass via the pulmonary
vascular bed or a patent foramen ovale (PFO) to the
arterial side and embolize to coronary or cerebral
vessels. The incidence of clinically significant PAE
is unknown, and only a handful of cases have been
reported (most without complications).
Approximately 25% of the population have a probe-PFO,
and the incidence of VAE is approximately 45%.
Therefore, approximately 10% to 15% of patients
operated in the sitting position are at potential
risk for PAE.
Precordial echocardiography has been used
preoperatively to identify patients at risk because
of a PFO. While detection of a PFO indicates that a
patient is at risk for PAE, failure to identify a
PFO is not reassuring because precordial echo has a
high false-negative rate. Hence, echocardiography is
not presently recommended as a routine part of the
preoperative evaluation of such patients.
III. Anesthetic management
Premedication
There is no contraindication to premedication of
patients who have small cranial nerve or cerebellar
lesions. If the patient has either elevated ICP or
symptomatic hydrocephalus, heavy premedication
should be avoided.
General monitoring issues
For most posterior fossa cases, routine operative
monitoring, usually with the addition of an
intraarterial catheter for blood pressure
monitoring, suffices.
For sitting cases, two additional issues arise.
First, blood pressure should be measured at the
level of the head because blood pressure measured at
the level of the heart will underestimate that
perfusing the brain. Second, monitoring for and
prevention of VAE are major considerations.
Monitoring for VAE
Hemodynamic changes. Monitoring of hemodynamics may
not provide sufficient advanced
warning in the case of massive air embolism because
the hemodynamic changes are abrupt and catastrophic.
Doppler and ETco2 monitoring. Clinically, several
monitoring options are available. In general,
Doppler and ETco2 monitoring are considered the
acceptable minimum.
Precordial Doppler
1.
This device can detect 1 mL of air or less, which
makes it more sensitive than any other monitor
except transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The
Doppler is not quantitative, however, and it
requires experience to recognize which of the
various sounds it emits is indicative of air.
2.
The Doppler probe should be placed after the patient
is in the operative position. The probe is usually
positioned at the middle third of the sternum on the
right side but, because the position of the right
atrium varies with the patient's position, proper
placement must be confirmed. Hearing heart tones is
not enough.
3.
To test for proper placement of the probe, agitated
saline is injected through a right atrial catheter
or peripheral intravenous line; alternatively, the
injection of 0.5 to 1 mL of air, carbon dioxide
(CO2), or circuit gas is acceptable. The probe is
properly placed if this maneuver produces
characteristic Doppler sounds signaling air
embolism.
4.
Because of its sensitivity, a properly positioned
Doppler, combined with end-tidal gas monitoring, is
essential for all posterior fossa procedures in the
seated position.
End-tidal gas monitoring
1.
For reasons already stated, VAE is associated with a
decreasing ETco2 and the presence of end-tidal
nitrogen (ETn2).
2.
While theoretically quantitative, ETn2 monitoring is
less useful in practice because the ETn2
concentration produced by even a large air embolus
is small and just reaches the threshold of the
sensitivity of clinically available end-tidal gas
monitors.
3.
ETco2 monitoring is of intermediate sensitivity but
provides a qualitative estimate of the size of a
VAE. In general, the larger the embolus, the greater
the decrease in ETco2. A decrease in ETco2 is not
specific for VAE, however, because a decrease in
cardiac output from any cause has the same effect.
4.
The ETco2 monitoring is particularly useful for
corroborating evidence of VAE from the Doppler and
judging the clinical and physiologic significance of
the embolus.
Central venous catheter (CVP)
1.
As a monitor for VAE, the CVP is insensitive and
easily superseded by other devices. It has another
utility, however.
2.
The CVP can help in positioning the Doppler. Also,
the aspiration of air both confirms the diagnosis of
VAE and serves as a treatment.
3.
To facilitate rapid aspiration of air, a
multiorificed catheter is recommended. Because air
tends to localize at the junction between the
superior vena cava and the right atrium, greatest
air retrieval occurs when the catheter orifices
traverse this region.
4.
Catheter position can be confirmed in a number of
ways. The catheter can be advanced until a right
ventricular pressure trace is obtained and then
withdrawn several centimeters. Alternatively, a
chest x-ray can be obtained to confirm position. One
simple method involves using the electrocardiogram,
but its use has a risk of microshock. The right arm
lead is connected to the catheter by a fluid column
of sodium bicarbonate or via the J wire used to
place the catheter. The tip is advanced until a
biphasic P wave appears, at which point the catheter
is withdrawn a few centimeters.
5.
One should always attempt to insert a CVP catheter
in posterior fossa cases requiring the sitting
position, but whether the inability to do so should
result in cancellation of the case is controversial.
PA pressure
1.
Because PA pressures rise with significant VAE, the
PA catheter can be useful for both diagnosis and
therapy.
2.
However, it is difficult to aspirate air from the
distal port of a PA catheter, and the middle port
may not be an optimal location. Aspiration is more
effective with a CVP catheter.
3.
In addition, as a diagnostic tool, the PA catheter
offers no advantage over ETco2 monitoring.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)
1.
TEE is more sensitive than Doppler ultrasound and is
specific because the air bubbles are visualized
directly. It is the only monitor that can detect PAE.
2.
TEE is expensive, requires special expertise, and
demands near constant attention. For these reasons,
in most centers, it is not a routine monitor for
VAE.
Prevention of VAE
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)
1.
The use of PEEP to prevent VAE in the sitting
position is controversial. High levels of PEEP (>10
cm H2O) are needed to increase
venous pressure at the head, and studies are
inconsistent as to whether PEEP decreases the
incidence of VAE. PEEP can, however, reduce venous
return, cardiac output, and mean arterial blood
pressure, which may be detrimental.
2.
Experimental data also indicate that the
discontinuation of PEEP is associated with the
entrainment of venous air and promotes right-to-left
shunting of air. Overall, PEEP is not recommended.
Volume loading
Although hypovolemia has been proposed as a
predisposing factor for VAE, evidence for a
prophylactic effect of volume loading on the
incidence of VAE and PAE is not strong enough to
warrant its routine use. Adequate hydration is the
goal.
Deliberate hypoventilation
1.
While some studies suggest that moderate
hypoventilation may reduce the risk of VAE,
hypoventilation also increases cerebral blood flow
and cerebral blood volume, which may impair surgical
exposure.
2.
Until the benefits of hypoventilation are confirmed,
mild hyperventilation is the more common practice.
Anesthetic technique
There is no evidence that any one anesthetic drug or
technique is superior to another for posterior fossa
surgery. Moreover, hemodynamic changes associated
with the assumption of the sitting position are
minor regardless of the anesthetic technique.
The use of nitrous oxide (N2O) is controversial.
Because of the risk of VAE and the ability of N2O to
expand air bubbles, some practitioners argue that
N2O should be avoided in sitting position cases.
This is a debatable position, however, because (a)
N2O has not been shown to increase the risk of VAE
in sitting cases and (b) morbidity has not been
shown to increase if N2O is used provided it is
discontinued the moment VAE is suspected. We
subscribe to the latter reasoning; N2O is used but
discontinued if VAE occurs. Sensitivity of the
embolism-detection device does not change.
The airway requires special attention. Often with
posterior fossa cases, substantial neck flexion is
required for optimal surgical exposure. Such flexion
can advance the tip of the endotracheal tube into a
mainstem bronchus or cause kinking of the
endotracheal tube in the posterior pharynx.
1.
Some clinicians use a wire-reinforced tube while
others prefer nasotracheal intubation. We use
neither routinely but emphasize that careful
assessment of tube patency and
position is of utmost importance because access to
the airway is quite limited.
2.
This assessment should be conducted after
positioning the patient but before making the skin
incision. Palpation of the cuff above the sternal
notch is useful in confirming the position of the
tube.
3.
If evidence of partial obstruction of the tube
(e.g., high airway pressures, slow upstroke of the
ETco2 tracing) exists, demonstrate that a suction
catheter passes freely through the endotracheal
tube, and insist on repositioning of the head and
neck if it does not.
In most cases, controlled mild hyperventilation is
desirable to improve surgical exposure and reduce
retraction pressure on the brain. However, changes
in respiration may be more sensitive to brain stem
manipulation than hemodynamic changes. As such, the
use of spontaneous ventilation may be appropriate in
rare circumstances, when manipulation or ischemia of
respiratory centers is likely. This should only be
undertaken after discussion with the surgeon since
hypoventilation that occurs with spontaneous
ventilation during general anesthesia may cause
brain engorgement and make surgical exposure more
difficult.
Intraoperative considerations
Cardiovascular reflexes
1.
Operations on or near the brain stem (e.g., during
acoustic schwannoma surgery) can produce abrupt, often
profound, cardiovascular responses that may signal
potential damage to the brain stem.
2.
Stimulation of the floor of the fourth ventricle,
medullary reticular formation, or trigeminal nerve
results in hypertension, usually in association with
bradycardia. Bradycardia also results from
stimulation of the vagus nerve.
3.
If such changes occur, the surgeon should be alerted
immediately so that he or she can avoid the
manipulation that provokes the response.
4.
Masking such changes with pharmacologic treatment is
undesirable unless the changes are recurrent and
severe. Hypertensive responses are typically so
abrupt and transient that by the time a drug is
administered, the stimulus is gone and treatment
becomes unnecessary.
5.
Bradycardia can be both treated and prevented with
glycopyrrolate or atropine, but the tachycardia
produced by the former is less marked.
Brain stem monitoring
1.
Cranial nerve injury is a significant risk of
operations in the area of the cerebellopontine
angle and lower brain stem. Therefore,
intraoperative stimulation and recording from
cranial nerves V, VII, VIII, XI, and XII are often
utilized.
2.
Monitoring techniques include somatosensory evoked
potentials (SSEPs), brain stem auditory evoked
potentials (BAEPs), and the spontaneous and evoked
electromyogram (EMG).
3.
This monitoring can be a challenge for the
anesthesiologist because muscle relaxants complicate
interpretation of the EMG, and N2O and high-dose
inhalation anesthesia may interfere with SSEPs. The
BAEPs are robust and minimally influenced by
anesthetics.
4. Although direct intracranial stimulation of the
facial nerve produces facial movement even in
well-paralyzed patients, "spontaneous" (i.e.,
surgical manipulation-induced) EMG discharges are
subtle. Hence, some electrophysiologists request
that, with the exception of succinylcholine for
intubation, no muscle relaxants be given. The
clinical necessity for this "pure" state has not
been documented, however, and some centers are
satisfied with a continuous infusion of relaxant to
maintain a constant level of modest twitch
suppression.
Treatment of VAE
1.
Except in rare cases of severe hemodynamic
instability, changing the patient's position is
seldom required and often inconvenient. (The surgeon
cannot identify a source of air entrainment if the
wound faces the floor!) Other measures should be
used first.
2.
Alert the surgeons; they should irrigate the field
with saline.
3.
If N2O is being used, discontinue it immediately.
4.
Aspirate the right atrial catheter.
5.
Provide cardiovascular support as needed.
6.
Modify the anesthetic technique as needed.
7.
Ask an assistant to compress both jugular veins
lightly to minimize air entrainment.
8.
Change patient position if the preceding measures
fail to prevent ongoing VAE.
Emergence from anesthesia
General objectives
1.
As with other types of intracranial neurosurgery,
prompt, smooth emergence and avoidance of coughing,
straining, and abrupt increases in blood pressure
are desirable.
2.
The feasibility of extubation depends on the usual
factors plus preexisting neurologic impairments, the
nature and extent of the surgery, and the likelihood
of brain stem edema
or injury. Even if extubation is not planned, one
should attempt to awaken the patient for
postoperative neurologic evaluation.
Ventilation/airway abnormalities
1.
Because of disease- or surgery-induced dysfunction
of cranial sensory or motor nerves, patients may
have difficulty swallowing, vocalizing, or
protecting the airway. In addition, damage to or
edema of the respiratory centers from intraoperative
manipulation can result in hypoventilation or
erratic respiratory patterns. Therefore, longer-term
ventilation and airway protection might be required
in some patients.
2.
Severe tongue and facial edema can occur owing to
position-induced venous or lymphatic obstruction.
The endotracheal tube should be left in place until
the edema resolves.
3.
Pulmonary edema may result from large VAE. Although
pulmonary edema is usually responsive to
conservative measures such as supplemental oxygen
(O2) and diuretics, continued postoperative
ventilation may be appropriate until evaluation is
completed.
Cardiovascular issues
Hypertension is common after posterior fossa surgery
and may contribute to edema formation and
intracranial hemorrhage. Hence, one should be
prepared to control postoperative hypertension.
Neurologic complications
1.
A variety of untoward neurologic complications can
occur after posterior fossa operations. These
include altered levels of consciousness, varying
degrees of paresis, and specific cranial nerve
deficits (e.g., visual disturbances, facial nerve
paresis, impaired swallowing or phonation).
2.
Treatment is supportive, but evaluation of delayed
emergence should proceed lest a treatable
nonanesthetic cause go unrecognized. If cerebral
paradoxical air embolism is suspected, hyperbaric
oxygen therapy may be warranted.
Pneumocephalus
1.
Air is retained in the cranial cavity after all
craniotomies regardless of position. When the
patient is in the sitting position, cerebrospinal
fluid drains easily, and a larger amount of air may
be trapped when the wound is closed. In most cases,
the air is reabsorbed uneventfully over several days
and no treatment is necessary. There is little
evidence that anesthetic technique influences either
the incidence or the volume of pneumocephalus.
2.
Tension pneumocephalus can occur when the brain
re-expands and compresses the air. This situation is
difficult to diagnose but should be suspected if
emergence is delayed after an otherwise uneventful
operation or if either cardiovascular collapse or
neurologic deterioration occurs postoperatively.
3.
In such rare circumstances, surgical evacuation may
be indicated.
|